Justice syndrome Papal infallibility it’s fantasy. Wrest a confession of his errors is a task almost insurmountable. Thus the Court of Review, which alone has the power to quash a conviction, did she consented only six times since 1945 to restore his innocence to a prisoner wrongly punished. While in the same time, several thousands of requests for revision were submitted, including one, famous, Guillaume Seznec. Suffice it to say that justice believes in the innocence of little ones she punished, or sent to prison..

Only six times, including the famous case of Patrick Dils and Roland Agret. let the blur in the veracity of things. Since April 13, the survivors are two more, Mark Machin and Loic Secher. But for some as for others, the court did not assume its full repentance. For all, it has overturned the convictions, but she returned the eight before a criminal court, charged for it to retry the unfortunate.

To form, of course. Because it gives its consent, such trials are only facade. For months or even years, the court conducted its own investigation, it has the archives of the first conference, those of Cassation and recently the appeal. Everyone agrees: the condemned is innocent. Otherwise, the court never rendered a decision in favor of revision. There are more than botch a case. To laugh. That is to say out of pure respect for the proceedings. Finicky, justice will not hate anything but anarchy is not.

.